Climate disclosure gives Canadian companies an edge with European investors, new research聽shows

Conversation Canada

Climate disclosure gives Canadian companies an edge with European investors, new research聽shows

A recent report from the Institute for Sustainable Finance at 黑料吃瓜资源 highlights benefits of disclosing climate-related risks and impacts.

By Yrjo Koskin, University of Calgary and Prateek Sood, Queen's University

July 17, 2026

Share

Canadian companies that disclose their climate-related risks and impacts have a considerable advantage over those that don鈥檛 when it comes to attracting financing from European institutional investors, according to our at 黑料吃瓜资源.

That advantage matters now more than ever. 鈥 companies publicly reporting on their greenhouse gas emissions, climate-related risks and how they plan to manage them 鈥 has become a harder sell.

and .

Canada鈥檚 stock market skews toward capital-intensive industries that rely heavily on foreign investment such as energy, materials, industrials and utilities. Remaining visible and attractive to major institutional investors is especially important for these companies, and Europe is the largest source of non-North American institutional investment in Canada, according to our data.

Share of Canadian Firms with Climate Reporting

The share of Canadian firms with climate reporting. (Yrjo Koskinen and Prateek Sood)

United States President Donald Trump鈥檚 tariffs and the broader unpredictability of American trade policy Attracting more capital from Europe gives Canadian companies a buffer against that volatility.

Climate disclosure is one of the clearest levers Canadian companies have to make themselves attractive to European capital. European investors increasingly need credible sustainability information to meet their own reporting obligations, and Canadian companies that lag on climate disclosure risk shutting themselves out of European capital markets altogether.

After Trump鈥檚 tariffs

provides preliminary evidence of this European preference for climate-reporting firms. We examined whether climate disclosures helped Canadian firms attract foreign institutional investors following of sweeping global tariffs, which he dubbed 鈥淟iberation Day.鈥

Average non-U.S. foreign holdings in Canadian firms by reporting status from 2024 to 2025.

Average non-U.S. foreign holdings in Canadian firms by reporting status from 2024 to 2025. (Yrjo Koskinen and Prateek Sood)

We chose that announcement because it created a major external shock to the markets, leading many investors to reassess the risks associated with U.S. assets and prompting some international investors to reduce their exposure to that market.

Liberation Day offered a useful test: as capital moved away from the U.S., did firms that disclosed climate data attract more of it than firms that didn鈥檛? The answer, we found, is yes.

After the shock, firms that reported climate data experienced an almost 25 per cent increase in foreign institutional holdings compared with firms that didn鈥檛 disclose. This effect was driven entirely by European investors. The result is statistically meaningful, but the significance level is relatively modest, so it should be interpreted as suggestive rather than conclusive evidence.

We ran additional robustness tests, statistical checks meant to rule out the most likely alternative explanations. We tested whether foreign institutional investors were avoiding Canadian firms that were more financially affected by the tariff announcement and whether they were avoiding Canadian firms that did more business in the U.S. In both cases, our results held.

Europe鈥檚 investors want climate data

Climate change is top of mind for institutional investors in Europe, which has the world鈥檚 most comprehensive . European investors understand how climate factors affect a company鈥檚 strategy, risk management and financial performance.

For investors operating in the European Union, sustainability performance can be in making portfolio allocation decisions.

European Union flags in front of glass building.

Climate data disclosure has unique value to European institutional investors who have to meet their own reporting obligations (Pexels).

, financial market participants are required to disclose sustainability indicators, such as greenhouse gas emissions, carbon footprint, biodiversity, water, waste and social factors. The data must be collected either directly from investee companies or through research that may include third-party data and experts.

When investing in jurisdictions that operate under a mostly voluntary reporting regime, like Canada, disclosure has unique value to European institutional investors because it helps them meet their own reporting obligations.

A case for mandatory disclosure in Canada

Our findings suggest disclosure practices are already shaping where European capital is invested in Canada. It鈥檚 likely other countries with voluntary reporting regimes are seeing similar patterns.

Our report also adds to a growing body of evidence . The benefits include .

are already strengthening their sustainability disclosure regulations, including Japan, Singapore, Australia, Chile and Mexico. In the U.S., pressing ahead with their own emissions-reporting rules despite the federal pullback on climate policy.

Savvy Canadian companies have so far been able to retain the interest of European institutional capital through voluntary disclosure. But have the opportunity to follow Europe鈥檚 example and .

Climate change doesn鈥檛 care about whether sustainability is in fashion, and the risks are growing. Among other benefits, expanding disclosures could help keep Canadian firms competitive in international capital markets going forward.The Conversation


, BMO Professor of Sustainable and Transition Finance, and , Research Associate, Institute for Sustainable Finance, Smith School of Business,

This article is republished from under a Creative Commons license. Read the .

The Conversation Canada