, financial market participants are required to disclose sustainability indicators, such as greenhouse gas emissions, carbon footprint, biodiversity, water, waste and social factors. The data must be collected either directly from investee companies or through research that may include third-party data and experts.
When investing in jurisdictions that operate under a mostly voluntary reporting regime, like Canada, disclosure has unique value to European institutional investors because it helps them meet their own reporting obligations.
A case for mandatory disclosure in Canada
Our findings suggest disclosure practices are already shaping where European capital is invested in Canada. It鈥檚 likely other countries with voluntary reporting regimes are seeing similar patterns.
Our report also adds to a growing body of evidence . The benefits include .
are already strengthening their sustainability disclosure regulations, including Japan, Singapore, Australia, Chile and Mexico. In the U.S., pressing ahead with their own emissions-reporting rules despite the federal pullback on climate policy.
Savvy Canadian companies have so far been able to retain the interest of European institutional capital through voluntary disclosure. But have the opportunity to follow Europe鈥檚 example and .
Climate change doesn鈥檛 care about whether sustainability is in fashion, and the risks are growing. Among other benefits, expanding disclosures could help keep Canadian firms competitive in international capital markets going forward.
, BMO Professor of Sustainable and Transition Finance, and , Research Associate, Institute for Sustainable Finance, Smith School of Business,
This article is republished from under a Creative Commons license. Read the .